You are a bloody fool ansd a complete dumbass if you think any “donation” to Trtumptard’s “campaign” is anythingt other than going right into his thieving pockets. Now, when was the last time you contributed, and the last time he campaigned? All those little old ladies iwho can’t pay their trailer park rent are paying for his legal bills.
Bondi, like Gabbard is just another criminal foreign asset, treasonous scum that should have been investigated years ago, and dis-barred. Send her to Gitmo along with trump and all his Fascist administration!!!
Pam Bondi is NOT a "strong woman"! She is nothing of the kind! Pam Bondi is a lying weasel and a stone cold, cast iron bitch!
But if we ARE talking of being scared, EVERY American citizen SHOULD be scared shitless as long as Bondi is AG. Because she will twist and turn what used to be a well thought over and well proven legal system to benefit her boss. With her as AG you'll be sure on one thing and that is that there will NEVER be anything done about Trump and that ALL evidence from previous court cases are seen to be shredded!
The Republicans who were too cowardly to reject her will be sorry they kowtowed to an ancient old bully, they should have rejected as well. Everything he touches is eventually destroyed. She is another “mark” in his con, and a weak suck but a dangerous one because it’s clear she only learned enough about laws to betray her country by subverting them. She allowed herself to be bought.
I think you've crossed a line here. It may be that Aryan-looking women - and men - are rated higher by the wannabe king, but there are other good women who happen to be blond and may even have big lips. If true, then noting Trump's and his administration's preference for blonde white women over, say, brunettes, is worth mentioning (as well as their choosing whites over any other race, given equal unqualifications), but attacking the look itself discredits all women. Would you speak the same way about men?
I don't like Pam Bondi either, and I did notice the blonde hair and other features, but I think most everyone is really funny looking. I would rather criticize her actions, lies and omissions.
Perhaps you missed the point, which was that the Trump Strumpets almost all have the same end look, no matter how they started out. And yes, I would speak the same way about men.
When the “Report” is released, I hope a phalanx of attorneys and judges will collaborate on a rebuttal report that draws from the Mueller Report, the Senate subcommittee Report, the Jack Smith Part I Report and any other relevant collections of information. An argument can be made for production of the Jack Smith Part II Report, since all cases have been dismissed. The rationale would be the Constitutional expectation of a fully informed public—especially in a time of a Constitutional crisis.
Jack Smith's Final Report on Trump Investigations (2025 ...
Editor's note: The Smith report, which presents a detailed account of the evidence against Donald Trump that the counsel's office had amassed, touches on a number of First Amendment issues. In addition to being twice impeached during his first term in the presidential office, Donald J. Jan 16, 2025 But we will never see Part 2.
I think there is an argument to be made that, where the DOJ will be claiming that a president “weaponized” the DOJ, the constitutional order requires that the nature of the evidence compiled and how it was compiled becomes essential information for American voters. They need to know both sides of a claim that the government was wrongly used for a personal objective. A court could well hold that given that the underlying prosecution is now dismissed and the government itself has decided to reveal its chosedn facts related to the prosecution, fairness requires release of the document.
We are waiting. Jack Smith resigned the day he handed in his investigation report. That was the second piece of paper he distributed. What is fair? The redacted version of the report?
I am hoping someone lets the world know how corrupt the GOP is...all of them unless they step up and do their jobs. There has to be one person who will.
I feel like this administration is/will be directly responsible for both the dangerous assault on the US and the actual deaths of hundreds of thousands of people ...that it warrants a consideration of "taking out"by special forces. These two evil clowns are worse than Osama bin Laden.
Bondi, Patel, Martin, Hegseth, Cain, and on and on. It's the Rocky Horror Picture Show of Administrations. Now Gym Jordan can finally learn what Weaponization of the DOJ really means.
What do you mean by "taking out"? Are you suggesting a coup or an assassination? If so you should probably get the hell out of "our" country you slime!
What a jewel of a column. Not a wasted word. And you know what? We can be confident that, unlike Pam Bondi's missives (Bissives?), it is actually by Harry Litman. And not by a(n addled) brain trust of newbie, 20-something propagandists from the School of Law at Liberty University whose mission statement is: "Every day, in every way, showing our fealty to the revenge tour of the Great Leader."
Harry: Thanks for offering these thoughtful and forceful analyses of some of the largest threats to the rule of law in our country. Our gain is a major loss for the LA Times! Your voice is needed now more than ever!
Stetson probably has a higher bar pass rate than any Ivy legue school;.
She is basically nutsy koo koo but she is better qualified than most AGs. Actually jailed people. Was personnally involved in a lot of litigation.
BTW I'fd rather see my opponent name a dud, someonbe who may be qualified but ineffectual. Like Biden. Had he named a bulldog, Trump would not be president.
Same for the 2nd impeachment. Buntch of duds. Failed to call victims like the Pence family. Could have called cowards who ran, like Hawley. The stage is the thing....
She was also a state AG, represented Trump in an impeachment case....can put a round peg in a round hole.
As I said, she is qualified. Too competent. I don't want trump to have anybody who is competent. Rope a dope. Matt Gaetz would have been perfect. Coundn't find the courthouse on a clear day.
Anyone that believes a word this Trump troll says is ignorant.
Willfully ignorant.
She's not ignorant. She knows the key to keeping her job is to say whatever Orange Hitler tells her to say..
Hence the willfulness. We did not know that the $25,000 “campaign donation” was a signing bonus to later undermine the DoJ.
You are a bloody fool ansd a complete dumbass if you think any “donation” to Trtumptard’s “campaign” is anythingt other than going right into his thieving pockets. Now, when was the last time you contributed, and the last time he campaigned? All those little old ladies iwho can’t pay their trailer park rent are paying for his legal bills.
Yup. And I prefer to think of myself as a clean, unusually handsome (and humble) fool.
He's more of a Hitler and Mussolini combo meal🤬
Bondi, like Gabbard is just another criminal foreign asset, treasonous scum that should have been investigated years ago, and dis-barred. Send her to Gitmo along with trump and all his Fascist administration!!!
Way to speak on it Sam Hirsch!!! I feel the same dam way!
💯‼️
Qattar. Any others?
I never liked this bleach blonde corrupt Barbie when she was here in Florida. And She Is even more corrupted now. She Is Trump Lap Girl Dog
You've heard of downward dog, haven't you?
And you sound like strong women scare you
Pardon my French, but: Fuck off!
Pam Bondi is NOT a "strong woman"! She is nothing of the kind! Pam Bondi is a lying weasel and a stone cold, cast iron bitch!
But if we ARE talking of being scared, EVERY American citizen SHOULD be scared shitless as long as Bondi is AG. Because she will twist and turn what used to be a well thought over and well proven legal system to benefit her boss. With her as AG you'll be sure on one thing and that is that there will NEVER be anything done about Trump and that ALL evidence from previous court cases are seen to be shredded!
The Republicans who were too cowardly to reject her will be sorry they kowtowed to an ancient old bully, they should have rejected as well. Everything he touches is eventually destroyed. She is another “mark” in his con, and a weak suck but a dangerous one because it’s clear she only learned enough about laws to betray her country by subverting them. She allowed herself to be bought.
She doesn't even NEED a report card. Just mention her name And all you hear is "FFFfffff"
Pause … then “uck!”
Be fair...an "A" for blondness, so there's that.
You notice that too? Is that a prerequisite? Where did Chumplestitskin grab her?
Too true! But she hasn't gotten the over-inflated lips like the rest of the Trump Strumpets yet. Maybe that's on her "to-do" list . . .
I think you've crossed a line here. It may be that Aryan-looking women - and men - are rated higher by the wannabe king, but there are other good women who happen to be blond and may even have big lips. If true, then noting Trump's and his administration's preference for blonde white women over, say, brunettes, is worth mentioning (as well as their choosing whites over any other race, given equal unqualifications), but attacking the look itself discredits all women. Would you speak the same way about men?
I don't like Pam Bondi either, and I did notice the blonde hair and other features, but I think most everyone is really funny looking. I would rather criticize her actions, lies and omissions.
Perhaps you missed the point, which was that the Trump Strumpets almost all have the same end look, no matter how they started out. And yes, I would speak the same way about men.
Suborn the DoJ, suborn the FBI, suborn the military … and the Constitution, too. Do I detect a pattern?
When the “Report” is released, I hope a phalanx of attorneys and judges will collaborate on a rebuttal report that draws from the Mueller Report, the Senate subcommittee Report, the Jack Smith Part I Report and any other relevant collections of information. An argument can be made for production of the Jack Smith Part II Report, since all cases have been dismissed. The rationale would be the Constitutional expectation of a fully informed public—especially in a time of a Constitutional crisis.
"What is the Smith report?
Jack Smith's Final Report on Trump Investigations (2025 ...
Editor's note: The Smith report, which presents a detailed account of the evidence against Donald Trump that the counsel's office had amassed, touches on a number of First Amendment issues. In addition to being twice impeached during his first term in the presidential office, Donald J. Jan 16, 2025 But we will never see Part 2.
I think there is an argument to be made that, where the DOJ will be claiming that a president “weaponized” the DOJ, the constitutional order requires that the nature of the evidence compiled and how it was compiled becomes essential information for American voters. They need to know both sides of a claim that the government was wrongly used for a personal objective. A court could well hold that given that the underlying prosecution is now dismissed and the government itself has decided to reveal its chosedn facts related to the prosecution, fairness requires release of the document.
We are waiting. Jack Smith resigned the day he handed in his investigation report. That was the second piece of paper he distributed. What is fair? The redacted version of the report?
I think someone will leak it eventually.
I am hoping someone lets the world know how corrupt the GOP is...all of them unless they step up and do their jobs. There has to be one person who will.
I feel like this administration is/will be directly responsible for both the dangerous assault on the US and the actual deaths of hundreds of thousands of people ...that it warrants a consideration of "taking out"by special forces. These two evil clowns are worse than Osama bin Laden.
Bondi, Patel, Martin, Hegseth, Cain, and on and on. It's the Rocky Horror Picture Show of Administrations. Now Gym Jordan can finally learn what Weaponization of the DOJ really means.
Got you twinks on the run
You're not a true Christian.
Kinda judgemental don't ya think?
You're "twinks" was inflammatory, so whatca 😢 😭 about?
Actually, I'll correct this because it's disrespectful to the people & survivors of 9/11. Those two are JUST AS BAD.
What do you mean by "taking out"? Are you suggesting a coup or an assassination? If so you should probably get the hell out of "our" country you slime!
What a jewel of a column. Not a wasted word. And you know what? We can be confident that, unlike Pam Bondi's missives (Bissives?), it is actually by Harry Litman. And not by a(n addled) brain trust of newbie, 20-something propagandists from the School of Law at Liberty University whose mission statement is: "Every day, in every way, showing our fealty to the revenge tour of the Great Leader."
This isn't her first corrupt rodeo.
But when it comes to Donald Trump, Bondi shows her loyalty in so many ways.
Do you think someone will release the second Jack Smith report - this generation’s Deep Throat?
No.
It would take a USDC judge to say no.
So, where is "Part 2"? Are there any judges left out of Musk's pockets?
Most.
FOIA?
Harry: Thanks for offering these thoughtful and forceful analyses of some of the largest threats to the rule of law in our country. Our gain is a major loss for the LA Times! Your voice is needed now more than ever!
"“the American people have witnessed the previous administration engage in a systematic campaign against its perceived political opponents.”
So what does Trump do? He turns around and "engages in a systematic campaign against his perceived political opponents."
Everything is a confession.
Yeah, but the difference is that the spewing from the right about the previous administration was mostly propaganda designed to stir the MAGA base..
e.g. Gym Jordan and James Comer and their collective grinding and gnashing of teeth over the Weaponization of Government.
💯‼️
ALL of the treasonous traitors need to be rounded up for a WWII Hague type military tribunal…
The MO of this administration: Intimidate through threats of federal workers' ethics and livelihoods. Purge.
Reset with Trump loyalists.
AKA fascism.
She is academically unqualified in addition to morally unfit. J.D., Stetson. The best and the brightest?
Stetson probably has a higher bar pass rate than any Ivy legue school;.
She is basically nutsy koo koo but she is better qualified than most AGs. Actually jailed people. Was personnally involved in a lot of litigation.
BTW I'fd rather see my opponent name a dud, someonbe who may be qualified but ineffectual. Like Biden. Had he named a bulldog, Trump would not be president.
Same for the 2nd impeachment. Buntch of duds. Failed to call victims like the Pence family. Could have called cowards who ran, like Hawley. The stage is the thing....
Middle of the road law schools teach to bar passage. And the AG of the U.S. requires a different skill set than a DA
But I agree that Garland’s measured approach to doing things the right way was a mistake here. Letitia James had a more appropriate response.
She was also a state AG, represented Trump in an impeachment case....can put a round peg in a round hole.
As I said, she is qualified. Too competent. I don't want trump to have anybody who is competent. Rope a dope. Matt Gaetz would have been perfect. Coundn't find the courthouse on a clear day.
"Failed to call victims...;" or were denied the opportunity to do so by the McConnell controlled Senate?
Thaat's bullshit.
How can this so called woman live with herself?? Or is that the way she was brought up??!
After selling her soul to Satan. She believes wealth and ethics are not $, so she took the money.